Head-to-head · Anthropic vs xAI

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7

CF
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic · API: $10 in / $50 out per M tokens
vs
G4
Grok 4.7
xAI · API: $2 to $4 in / $6 to $12 out per M tokens

Quick answer: Claude Fable 5.1 stands out for highest quality ceiling in the generally available Claude lineup. Grok 4.7 stands out for large context window at a moderate price. Reviewed September 2026.

Overview

Claude Fable 5.1: Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's premium generally available model, priced above Opus and built for the hardest reasoning, coding and analysis tasks. Anthropic says the cheaper Opus 5.5 now matches it on most work, so Fable 5.1 makes most sense where the last few points of quality justify the price.

Grok 4.7: Grok 4.7 is xAI's latest flagship model for coding, agentic tasks and knowledge work. It has a 500,000-token context window, accepts text and image input, and supports adjustable reasoning levels.

At a glance

DimensionClaude Fable 5.1Grok 4.7
VendorAnthropicxAI
Starting priceAPI: $10 in / $50 out per M tokensAPI: $2 to $4 in / $6 to $12 out per M tokens
Pricing model Paid Paid
Free tier No No
CategoryGenerative AIGenerative AI

Strengths and limits

Claude Fable 5.1

  • Highest quality ceiling in the generally available Claude lineup
  • Suited to long, high-stakes analysis
  • Heavy prompt caching lowers cost for repeated context

Watch out for

  • $10 input and $50 output per million tokens
  • Opus 5.5 is comparable on most tasks at lower cost
  • Not needed for routine work

Grok 4.7

  • Large context window at a moderate price
  • Strong on coding and agent tasks
  • Real-time knowledge through the xAI ecosystem

Watch out for

  • Smaller enterprise ecosystem than OpenAI, Anthropic or Google
  • Price steps up for prompts over 200,000 tokens
  • Fewer professional integrations

Key features

Claude Fable 5.1

  • 1M-token context window at standard pricing
  • Top-tier reasoning and agentic performance
  • Cache reads priced at a steep discount for repeated context
  • Tool use and computer use
  • Available through the Claude API and major clouds

Grok 4.7

  • 500,000-token context window
  • Text and image input
  • Flexible reasoning levels
  • Available through the xAI API

Pricing compared

Claude Fable 5.1 is priced by usage rather than by seat: API: $10 in / $50 out per M tokens. That means cost scales with how much text you send and receive, so estimate your monthly volume before committing.

Grok 4.7 is priced by usage rather than by seat: API: $2 to $4 in / $6 to $12 out per M tokens. That means cost scales with how much text you send and receive, so estimate your monthly volume before committing.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Grok 4.7?

It depends on the work. Claude Fable 5.1 stands out for highest quality ceiling in the generally available Claude lineup. Grok 4.7 stands out for large context window at a moderate price.

How do Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.7 compare on price?

Claude Fable 5.1 is priced by usage rather than by seat: API: $10 in / $50 out per M tokens. That means cost scales with how much text you send and receive, so estimate your monthly volume before committing. Grok 4.7 is priced by usage rather than by seat: API: $2 to $4 in / $6 to $12 out per M tokens. That means cost scales with how much text you send and receive, so estimate your monthly volume before committing.

Is there a free option between Claude Fable 5.1 and Grok 4.7?

Neither lists a permanent free tier. Look for trials or usage-based pricing to test on real work first.

Read the full reviews